Zimbabwe faces a new political storm with President Robert Mugabe pushing for an early election opposed by rivals while hardliners are threatening Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai over secret briefings with United States (US) officials.

Mugabe's Zanu-PF party is expected to officially endorse the 86-year-old leader this weekend as candidate for a general election he wants by mid-2011

Mugabe’s Zanu-PF party is expected to officially endorse the 86-year-old leader this weekend as candidate for a general election he wants by mid-2011, although analysts say the vote could still be postponed for at least a year due to regional pressure.

With the political calendar cloudy, there are fears the country is rolling back into another crisis similar to the disputed 2008 elections which forced regional leaders from the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to intervene.

“If one looks at all that is going on around us now, it’s fair to conclude that we are heading into a crisis, a very big political storm,” said Eldred Masunungure, a political science professor at the University of Zimbabwe.

Alongside the push for an early poll, state media are reporting that Zanu-PF hawks are pushing for an official investigation against Tsvangirai over US State Department cables released by WikiLeaks regarding his briefings with the US ambassador in Harare, Charles Ray, which some officials see as “bordering on treason”.

Quoting unnamed government sources, the weekly Sunday Mail said comments by Tsvangirai suggesting that his Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) was not genuine in calling for the lifting of Western sanctions against Zanu-PF and that he was working with Washington to oust Mugabe amounted to treason.

“He took an oath of office which does not permit him to commit the treasonous offence he has committed, and so President Mugabe has an obligation to set up a commission of inquiry,” the newspaper quoted one official as saying.

Bitter attacks

Tsvangirai has refused to be drawn into the spat. His aides say he is not guilty and describe the controversy as personal attacks on the prime minister.

Analysts say Mugabe’s camp could be waging a psychological war on Tsvangirai. Treason charges, that could turn the MDC leader into a political martyr at a time when there are questions over his leadership qualities, are unlikely to be pursued.

Mugabe’s officials are delighted with comments by former US ambassador Christopher Dell, also released by WikiLeaks, depicting Tsvangirai as a “flawed figure, who is not readily open to advice, indecisive and with questionable judgment in selecting those around him”.

State media have only highlighted Dell’s opinion of Mugabe as a shrewd and tactical politician while skirting uncomplimentary reference to the Zimbabwean leader as a ruthless survivor with “deep ignorance on economic issues”.

The Zanu-PF has turned up the volume with more bitter attacks on Tsvangirai on state radio and television ahead of an annual party meeting this week that will endorse Mugabe’s candidacy.

Mugabe and his party have held power for over 30 years, initially with a lot of promise, but critics say they have since driven the country into an economic ditch and hung onto power through violence and vote-rigging. Mugabe denies these charges.

Analysts say Mugabe has already deployed his war veteran campaigners in the countryside ahead of any election.

“I think Mugabe is almost set to have elections because he believes the MDC is in some bad shape, and that without political reforms, he can win the elections,” Masunungure said.

“His major problem is that SADC is not convinced that early elections are good for Zimbabwe or the region, and he will face a crisis of legitimacy internationally,” he added.

Regional pressure
Tsvangirai and a smaller MDC faction in the coalition are trying to mobilise regional pressure on Mugabe to deliver on promised reforms and Zimbabwe’s business leaders are against early elections they say will scupper economic recovery.

Senior Western diplomats in Harare say a free and fair vote is impossible in a few months and are counselling for more time for reforms, including the repeal of repressive laws, media freedom, new electoral laws and updating of the voter register.

“People fear that an election on Zanu-PF terms will simply mean violence, but there is also a danger that Mugabe risks doing a Gbagbo,” Masunungure said of Ivorian President Laurent Gbagbo who is refusing to concede defeat after calling a poll he thought he would win.

“Tsvangirai may have his problems but he and the MDC still enjoy a lot of goodwill in a population tired of Zanu-PF.”

Lovemore Madhuku, chairperson of political pressure group National Constitutional Assembly, said it was still possible Zanu-PF may not call early elections for strategic reasons.

“Mugabe values and has thrived on regional and continental solidarity and he may not want to offend fellow African leaders if he thinks there are some strong reservations,” he said.

“His first option will be to bring them on board, but Mugabe has survived this long politically by pressing his advantage but also always keeping his options open,” he said. — Reuters


With a $500,000 budget and with some donations still said to be on their way, the conference is expected to be a feast for many Zanu-PF activists.

Zimbabwe’s former ruling party, Zanu-PF, is set to blow close to $500,000 in five days when it gathers for its annual Christmas bash disguised as a party conference.

President Mugabe’s party meets from Wednesday (December 15) to Sunday (December 19) in the eastern border city of Mutare. About 4,000 delegates drawn countywide and some from regional liberation movements are expected at the conference.

With a $500,000 budget and with some donations still said to be on their way, the conference is expected to be a feast for many Zanu-PF activists.

At recent past conferences and congresses some have been accused of helping themselves to freebies and goodies that have been donated.

Zanu-PF chairman Simon Khaya Moyo says Mugabe’s candidacy in the next elections will not be an issue because he got the mandate at the congress in 2010.

“The conference is not about the president … We had our congress last year and we elected the president of the party who automatically becomes the candidate in the next elections,” said Moyo.

Realistically, Mugabe, 86, would contest his last election next year because if he wins, his term of office would end in 2016 when he would be 92. After that, it would be unlikely that he would run for another term.

Zanu-PF officials have publicly conceded that the Mutare conference would not discuss the controversial succession because his rivals had failed to call for an extraordinary congress to deal with the issue.

Party leader Mugabe normally delivers the main address at the Zanu-PF conference where most policies which his government would promulgate in the future are announced.

The conference is also used as a platform where the party attacks its opponents, mainly the West and America, and with calls for the lifting of what the party describes as illegal sanctions, taking centre stage at most of these conferences.

Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), which is a partner to the shaky coalition government before the signing of the coalition pact, would also get a bashing from such conferences.

Clemence Manyukwe, a political editor of Financial Gazette commenting on the conference says, ‘There is a general feeling that if the conference endorsed early polls ZANU-PF would be clearly defying the national mood, which to all intents and purposes, is seemingly against snap polls.”

Manyukwe says there are genuine fears the country could be plunged back into political chaos and economic instability witnessed before the consummation of the global political agreement.

But prominent Harare lawyer Terence Hussein, who has represented ZANU-PF luminaries in elections-related matters before the courts, said chances of the conference leaving the party leader with egg on his face over the election issue were next to nothing.

“It seems the position for the holding of elections is pretty strong. The conference usually supports its leadership, I don’t see any decision opposed to the leadership, I don’t see that happening,” said Hussein.


Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe’s Zanu PF party will be meeting from Wednesday for its annual conference, which is expected to endorse the veteran ruler’s bid to stand for another term next year.

The 86 year-old ruler appears to have crushed dissent and his succession is one subject that will not be discussed at the three-day conference.

Zanu PF is also expected to give the nod to President Mugabe’s unpopular push for fresh elections mid next year.

“The conference is not about the president,” said Mr Simon Khaya-Moyo, the Zanu PF chairperson.

“We had our congress last year and we elected the president of the party who automatically becomes the candidate in the next elections.”

Legislators from the three parties in Zimbabwe’s fragile unity government say they do not want early elections but analysts say Zanu PF MPs cannot tell Mr Mugabe openly about their objections.

Zanu PF deals ruthlessly with rebels and opposition to the president’s policies from within is rare.

Land reform

Opposition leader Dr Simba Makoni who was pushed out of Zanu PF when he challenged Mr Mugabe in the 2008 presidential elections said he did not expect much from the annual gathering.

“I don’t believe this conference will be different from the previous Zanu PF meetings,” Dr Makoni said.

“I don’t see Mugabe listening to anyone and his position is that he knows everything and he will not go back on his position to have elections.”

Mr Moyo said the conference would tackle another controversial issue of transferring majority shareholding in multinational companies to locals.

The initiative viewed as another attempt to reward Mr Mugabe’s loyalists like the disastrous land reform programme is set to be the foundation for Zanu PF’s election campaign next year.

Meanwhile, Zanu PF hardliners are pushing for the arrest of Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai after US cables released by the whistle blower website WikiLeaks revealed that Mr Mugabe’s rival privately backed Western sanctions against Zimbabwe.

Treason charges

Zanu PF senior officials have been calling on Mr Tsvangirai to resign and face possible charges of treason.

“There are only two things that could happen in any civilized democracy, for him to resign not just from government but public life altogether,” said Prof Jonathan Moyo, a Zanu PF MP and former Information minister in Mr Mugabe’s previous government.

“He must also be prosecuted for a litany of treasonous acts against the state.”

However, a spokesperson for Mr Tsvangirai’s Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party said their leader was not taking the Zanu PF threats seriously.
“There are pressing issues in the country as we prepare for elections,” said MDC spokesperson, Mr Nelson Chamisa.

“We can’t allow ourselves to chase shadows and shoot at straws.

“Mr Tsvangirai wants Zimbabwe to be free and democratic and nothing can distract him from that goal.”

He said the Wikileaks claims had neither basis nor credibility.


Dear Council of elders – You will notice that I have been incredibly quiet in communications following the ill-fatted November meeting in which Mr Mollife unilaterally imposed his own agenda on a PEC meeting.

Lloyd Msipa

The agenda was directed at hounding individuals deemed to be those who oppose Mr Mollife’s wayward conduct ranging from several breaches of the party constitution and the likes of myself and Barbara questioning his possible treasonous meetings in Scotland, the non transparent conduct of the ZAPU party account by him among other things.

Well, the persecution of myself and I also note Barbara Nyagomo has not stopped and in all manner is ultra-vires the party constitution. Mollife is now on a one man personal crusade and his conduct is not in the interest of ZAPU. As of this evening based on a malicious false media reports in The Telegraph UK and other malicious websites of which I believe may have some association with the man (email below) he is now a one man judicial officer -come police officer- come mollife.

He now expects me to answer to a report in the media. I have chosen not to dignify his nonsense with a response, except to say I am disappointed that a man I once considered a leader and on several occasions carried him in my personal vehicle together with his side kick Stephen Drew (Ecomomics secretary)from London to Birmingham and Leicester has stooped down so low to believe everything he reads.

I therefore do not see how I can work with a man who lays claim to be a leader and at the same time conducts himself in that manner. Effectively, I have been hounded out of the UK PEC and questions abound as to the constitutionality of this man’s conduct. Constitutionally, the man has no qualms in breaking it as evidenced by his unilateral inquiry below surpassing the relevant COE.

As a parting word of constitutional interpretation, If any officer in the PEC or other has a grievance regarding another officer of the party. There are channels within the party that may be followed to satisfy that inquiry. Now, If the so-called chairman can break the rules left-right and center what does that say about his suitability to hold his position. I rest my case. I however believe that no man is bigger than ZAPU and hence believe that time will tell and time will weigh the questionable leadership qualities of Mr Mollife.

At a personal level, I have completely lost respect for the man. In that respect, I do not foresee a situation were I can continue to work with him. I therefore regard the man henceforth as my nemesis. I therefore step down from my position in the PEC UK with immediate effect. I will continue to carry out the business of the party from another more accommodating platform.

To the council of elders, I am sure you have ample evidence as to how much damage this man has done to the party and will continue to do damage in the future. In the interest of ZAPU may I implore that this man be stopped or else all our work in ZAPU will be in vain. The conduct of this man compromises the very values that were espoused by our leaders the likes of Chikerema and Nkomo when they formed ZAPU in 1961 and espoused in the revived ZAPU by Dr Dumiso Dabengwa, Amai Mukaratirwa and Dr Ralph Mguni. His conduct breaks every legal, moral and traditional fundamental tenet espoused in the ZAPU constitution.

I trust this is in order.

Lloyd Msipa


Chimanimani,- A Movement for Democratic Change activist in Zhombeni area here, Donald Sithole has been fined a beast by the local headman for allegedly putting up his party’s posters in the area while in another incident an MDC minister faces arrest for refusing to pay road toll fees.

MDC deputy minister belonging to the Morgan Tsvangirai faction Tongai Matutu faces arrest

Sithole, an MDC activist was last week dragged at headman Saurombe’s traditional court after Zanu (PF) supporters who had seen him putting up MDC posters calling for a meeting reported him to the kraalhead.

The chairperson of the MDC in the area, Lameck Chishakwe said Sithole had been given two weeks to pay the beast or risk being banished in the area.

Chishakwe said the headman said the MDC was not welcome in his area and anyone who was seen trying to campaign for the party will be punished.

“For putting the posters Sithole was fined a beast which he should surrender to the chief before Christmas,” said Chishakwe.

Chishakwe said Sithole was part of the MDC youths who were putting posters in the area alerting party supporters about a meeting which was supposed to be addressed by local MDC- Member of Parliament, Lynnette Karenyi.

Two weeks ago the headman forced villagers to attend and buy Zanu (PF) party cards in the area. One of the villagers among the gathering contacted Karenyi through her mobile phone advising her about the issue. The legislator swiftly raised alarm to the police who immediately stopped the practice.

Blessing Nyamaropa of the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) in Mutare said actions by the the headman were illegal.

“What the headman has done is a violation of Sithole’s rights to support a party of his choice. We urge him to keep a record of the proceedings and the headman’s acknowledgement of the beast. If the issue is formally brought to
our attention we will certainly act as human rights defenders ,” said Nyamaropa.

The headman could not be reached for a comment.

Meanwhile an MDC deputy minister belonging to the Morgan Tsvangirai faction Tongai Matutu faces arrest for refusing to pay the US1 road toll fees along the Masvingo – Bulawayo Highway on Friday.

Matutu who is Deputy Minister for Youth Empowerment and Indigenisation refused to pay the toll fees while on his way to Bulawayo.

Masvingo police spokesperson Inspector Tinaye Matake confirmed the development saying:“We want to arrest him for assaulting ZIMRA (Zimbabwe Revenue Authority) officials and subsequently refusing to pay the toll gate fee at Mhandamahwe last Friday. We consider the crime serious since Matutu is a minister who should lead by example.”

Matutu is also among the six MDC-T MPs who are wanted for intimidating Zanu (PF) supporters who had gathered for a rally in Bikita around August this year.

His lawyer Douglas Mwonzora told Masvingo Magistrate Oliver Mudzongachisvo who convicted Matutu that all the crimes levelled against his client were a political ploy by Zanu (PF) to thwart MDC-T in the province.

Matutu is considered to be the strongest MDC –T strategist in Masvingo who crafted ideas which saw the first ever defeat of Zanu (PF) in 14 constituencies.

“Matutu is feared for what he has done so far. As a lawyer who freely represents MDC-T activists and a vibrant young politician, obviously Zanu (PF) is baying to see him being crucified,” said an analyst who refused to be named.

Matutu was also recently convicted of assaulting Chief Serima.


Roy Bennett says Zanu-PF is once again readying to kill and wreak havoc. Speech by Roy Bennett, Treasurer General of the Movement for Democratic Change, to the Foreign Correspondents’ Association Johannesburg, December 10

Ladies and gentlemen,

I am again in exile, driven from my home by a malevolent and vengeful regime. Zanu remains determined to deny us our most basic human right

Thank you for inviting me to speak to you tonight. It’s always a privilege to meet again with those I know and to have the opportunity to develop new relationships and better understandings.

Zimbabweans are again at a crossroads. We are again faced with failure and opportunity, fear and promise. Let me explain, using my own personal situation as an illustration, a set of circumstances mirrored in the lives of millions of my countrymen.

I am again in exile, driven from my home by a malevolent and vengeful regime. Zanu remains determined to deny us our most basic human right- the right to live peaceful and productive lives among our own people.

Increasing harassment of me was a clear precursor to further imprisonment and fabrications. I was left with little choice but to take my leave for a second time. I am better off than my many brothers and sisters in South Africa, most of whom live in dire poverty and despair.

But, like them, I am tired, homesick and heart sore My experience is symbolic of the political malaise that continues to grip Zimbabwe. Indeed, the painful trials and tribulations I have undergone in the last 18 months go beyond mere symbolism and are a direct result of the ugly reality that holds sway in Zimbabwe.

The leadership of the Movement for Democratic Change entered the so-called inclusive government under pressure-and yet also with the utterly desperate cries of ordinary Zimbabweans ringing in our ears. Zanu’s deliberate abuse of the economy for its own enrichment had reduced the people to rags.

Cholera was running rampant, schools had collapsed. We wanted to put SADC to the test, to see if they would back their own guarantees around a new constitution and free and fair elections. The alternative was a brutal, no-holds-barred showdown with the forces of repression.

Let me expand a bit. Much has been written about the MDC being ‘naïve’, being ‘hoodwinked by Mugabe’ and so on. I returned from exile in February 2009 to participate in a critical party meeting that would decide whether or not we would participate in government.

I arrived at Harare airport, unsure whether I was to be arrested and jailed again. Zimbabwe had already effectively closed down. All its vital economic organs were beyond critical. There was no fuel, no food, people were starving and the currency was worthless.

We felt that Zimbabwe’s immediate future might resemble Somalia. Our party put the people’s interest first. Observers should acknowledge the proper motives of the MDC leadership, even if they take issue with us on tactical grounds. Robust debate took place behind closed doors, but the final decision was that we should try to implement the Global Political Agreement for the good of the people.

If our leadership had rejected this proposal, Harare would quite conceivably have gone up in smoke. Do not underestimate the anger of people on the street, people whose support for MDC in successive elections had been simply ignored. We strove mightily to avoid a Kenyan conflagration.

It came as little surprise that Zanu had few intentions of meeting its obligations under the GPA. For me it was the beginning of a roller-coaster ride. I had received an exhilarating welcome by the people in Harare, carried shoulder high to party headquarters at Harvest House.

But, as you know, I was soon arrested at Charles Prince airport-at the very moment my colleagues were being sworn in. Mugabe could not bear the prospect of shaking my hand. That was no loss to me. The idea of holding hands with a mass-murderer leaves me cold. I spent 40 days in the unspeakable squalor and filth of Mutare Remand Prison.

During this period, six inmates died of malnutrition. I was surrounded by walking corpses, surreal apparitions of skin and bone, men whose bodies barely clung to their souls. If a government is to be judged by the way it treats its most helpless and vulnerable, then truly Zanu is but a half step from the infamy of Nazism.

The conditions in Zimbabwe’s jails were little different to what I imagine they were at Auschwitz. The Commissioner of Prisons, Paradzai Zimondi, is criminally indifferent to the lives of the thousands who have perished needlessly-and he must surely account for this one day.

Demonstrations of the regime’s arrogance multiplied in short order. The junta’s humiliation and intimidation of the country’s elected representatives was commonplace from the outset. Some of these incidents were public, but many were private and unpublicised. Nelson Chamisa was physically shirt-fronted by Constantine Chiwenga in a cowardly display of bullying.

My wife and I were threatened with death by drunken militia who had been instructed to set up a roadblock for us. The shenanigans surrounding my show trial and the framing of numerous MDC Members of Parliament were a further demonstration of Zanus duplicity.

As a Christian who has experienced the goodness and love of Jesus Christ, it is clear to me that Zanu is an anti-Christ. Zanu has turned on its head all that is good and right. Where there is plenty, it brings hunger. Where there was joy, it brings tears. Where there is hope, it brings despair. Where we would build, it destroys. Where we would save life, it kills. Where there is peace, it wages war. Where there is truth, it spews lies.

Just this week Robert Mugabe had the gall to tell President Zuma (and I quote): ‘I am a lawyer and I am not happy to be in a thing which is semi-legal’. Apparently, semi-legalities bother him, but not blatant illegalities.

Let us never forget that the MDC is the only legitimate party of government post-2008. We won that election outright. Zanu lost. But aided and abetted by Thabo Mbeki, Mugabe bludgeoned his way to the negotiating table, treading on the broken lives and limbs of Zimbabweans to secure a place in the current dispensation.

The liberation mantras and haughty claims to authenticity and legitimacy which litter Zanu rhetoric are just that-rubbish, refuse, a stench in the nostrils of the Zimbabwean people. So too are the oft-repeated allegations by Zanu and its supporters that MDC is a front for ‘The West’. We expect that from Zanu, but to those in SADC who take this line we say: who are you to second-guess the democratic will of the people of Zimbabwe?

Why should the votes of millions count for nothing? Who are you to suggest that Zimbabweans are too stupid and too ignorant to choose for themselves? A case of reverse neocolonialism if ever there has been! We are tired of the insults and insinuations. We make no apologies and will not tip-toe around the region. What is said privately about crazy old men must be spelt out directly.

Mugabe and his military junta must be told their game is up. The situation in the Ivory Coast has shown again the absurdity of rewarding the losers-though a different approach might do that other loser, Thabo Mbeki, out of a job. He seems to have carved out a niche as an advocate for failed dictators.

What is the road ahead in Zimbabwe? Mired in a dysfunctional constitutional process, caught in an economic holding-pattern and held to ransom by Zanu’s coterie of gangsters-comically known as the Joint Operations Command-the GPA is hardly a blueprint for recovery and national healing.

It was always meant to be a temporary measure-and its trajectory has underlined the need to move beyond it as a matter of urgency. What good has come out of it is almost exclusively the work of the MDC. Dollarisation and the efforts of the party through the Finance Ministry have made life more bearable for Zimbabweans.

But the people must finish the job. We must stand up and show Zanu the door. We must re-group and move forward together. It is time for all Zirnbabweans to unite, to focus on the goal and the obstacle, Zanu-PF!

Civil society must retain its independence but must accept the leadership of the MDC during this phase of the struggle. For its part, the MDC must see civil society as a strategic partner and recognize that there are multiple centres of resistance. I hope to play a role in building these bridges. The lessons of South Africa’s United Democratic Front are there for all to see.

From SADC, and from South Africa in particular, we ask for nothing more than a level playing field. Genuinely free and fair elections are enough for us. And the major part of that is an election campaign and aftermath that is free of violence and intimidation.

It is not enough to have a quiet day of voting after the people have been battered in the preceding three months-and are to be battered again after polling. For South Africa, surely it is time to see that a stable, prosperous and democratic Zimbabwe is in its interests? During the Mbeki era, we came to expect pseudo-intellectual hubris as a substitute for the pragmatic assessment of national interests.

We hope that the new dispensation under President Zuma will be more attuned to the day-to-day needs of ordinary South Africans. Zimbabweans in South Africa want to go home. If Jacob Zuma wants to create a million jobs, he can do no better than to create the conditions that will help Zimbabweans do what they want to do: to return home and make a living among their own families and communities.

The alternative is further stress on service delivery-and on a social fabric that is already groaning under the weight of migrant Zimbabweans. It is vain to believe that Zimbabweans can be prevented by force or by regulation from coming and staying in South Africa. Faced with hunger and abuse at home, they will continue to come.

In all this we are not naive about Zanu. It will require more than polite talk to push a group of delusional political deviants to hold free and fair elections. Zimbabwe’s post-independence history shows that the barest shreds of humanity, let alone democratic norms, mean nothing to Zanu when confronted with a loss of power.

As we speak, Zanu-PF, the party of violence, has deployed soldiers to mobilise brown-shirt brigades against the people. Rewarded by the spoils of blood diamonds, they have been instructed to kill and wreak havoc. We may yet see violence of an unprecedented nature. Mugabe’s madness is underway. It must be exposed by people like you.

I am sure South Africa’s negotiators have seen glimpses of this radical self-centredness in recent months. But it goes further than they might imagine. It is a fact that Zanu collaborated with the Apartheid government at the same time as it played host to ANC representatives in the 1980s.

Moreover, it collaborated with the Apartheid regime in the brutalisation of its own people. In 1983, at the height of Matabeleland massacres, Emmerson Mnangagwa requested material assistance from the South African Defence Force.

It is also a fact that Mugabe used Central Intelligence operatives, many of whom had served under Ian Smith, to monitor ANC cadres while they were in Zimbabwe. Ironically, one of those placed under surveillance was Thabo Mbeki.

Zimbabweans themselves need little reminding of the character of Zanu’s criminal mindset. We have seen Zanu slay our people, felt its cruel rod on our backs, its boots on our necks. We see the guilty mock us every day. It is a system and a perverse ideology-but it is much more than that. It is deeply personal.

Those who butchered the Ndebeles were rewarded and now queue up to succeed Mugabe. This junta laugh and leer, they ridicule the blood and tears of the people. We know they will not go quietly. We hope and pray for a non-violent transition-but we do not expect it.

Yet, against all odds, we will achieve the dream of a new Zimbabwe built on justice and dignity. What we have is not good enough. No. We want and deserve something better. We want to be free- totally and completely free of the Zanu pestilence. Free to build a future for ourselves and our children.

I sense that this is the last chance for a peaceful resolution. Let us not beat about the bush: if Zanu will not accept the will of the people, what remains for Zimbabweans? How long must we suffer these humiliations and degradations?

Long, long ago, mass mobilisation became a moral right. SADC is at a crossroads. Will it do what is right? If it will not, Zimbabweans cannot continue to be trampled, to be taken for granted. We must shoulder the burden, we must take control of our destiny, we must seize our birthright- and we will.

I thank you and wish you all a peaceful, blessed Christmas and ask humbly that you write for, and in the interests of, the aspirations of ordinary